Virtualisation & Container Platforms

Design the platform around its workloads and the people who will operate it.

We design, migrate and improve virtualisation and container platforms around the applications they need to run. The approach accounts for dependencies, performance, licensing, security, deployment practices and day-two ownership.

Discuss Your Platform
Engineers working with virtualised server and container platform components.

Make day-two operation part of the architecture

Virtualisation and containers can consolidate workloads and make releases more repeatable, but only when storage, networking, identity, observability, backup, capacity and lifecycle work are considered together. Otherwise they move complexity rather than reducing it.

We begin with the applications and operating environment. Some workloads may suit containers, others may remain as virtual machines, and some may need changes before either route is appropriate. The architecture, migration sequence, deployment tooling, and ongoing operating model follow from those findings.

This can include:

  • Workload, dependency, and suitability assessment to decide what should remain, migrate, or be containerised
  • Virtualisation and cluster architecture aligned to compute, storage, network, availability, and licensing requirements
  • Container runtime and orchestration standards selected according to workload behaviour and operational capability
  • Isolation, identity, and network controls designed around tenant, application, and administrative boundaries
  • Deployment, validation, and rollback automation to make releases and infrastructure changes repeatable
  • Monitoring, patching, backup, and lifecycle processes so the platform remains supportable after migration
  • Staged migration with documented ownership to limit disruption and leave the operating team in control

If application constraints make platform change difficult, existing and legacy system engineering can address the application-level work alongside the infrastructure programme.

Technology selected for workload and operating fit

  • Virtualisation

    KVM, QEMU, XCP-ng, Xen, oVirt

  • Application & System Containers

    Docker, Podman, LXC, LXD

  • Container Runtimes

    containerd

  • Orchestration & Cluster Management

    Nomad, Kubernetes, OpenShift, Rancher, Docker Swarm

  • Existing & Migration Platforms

    VMware, Hyper-V, Proxmox VE

Where virtualisation and containers can improve control and supportability

Changes are assessed against the complete workload environment, not treated as an isolated technology refresh.

Virtualisation Platform Migration
Move workloads from ageing, constrained, or costly hypervisors to an appropriate target through dependency mapping, staged cutovers, validation, and rollback.

Application Containerisation
Package suitable applications with explicit runtime, storage, network, and configuration requirements while preserving the behaviour the service needs.

Cluster Lifecycle & Day-Two Operation
Define patching, upgrades, node replacement, capacity, backup, recovery, observability, and runbooks before the platform becomes operationally critical.

Deployment & Rollback Automation
Standardise builds, configuration, releases, validation, and recovery so change is repeatable across environments and providers.

Workload Isolation & Access Control
Reduce lateral movement and unintended access through tenant boundaries, network policy, service identity, and least-privilege administration.

Capacity & Resource Management
Use workload evidence, thresholds and quotas to allocate CPU, memory, storage and network capacity deliberately, with a defined resource buffer.

On-Premises, Hosted & Hybrid Operation
Apply consistent deployment, monitoring, access, and lifecycle practices where workloads span existing infrastructure, data centres, or hosting providers.

What the platform needs to make more predictable

The objective is not containerisation or consolidation for its own sake. It is safer change, appropriate isolation, clearer capacity, repeatable deployment, and an operating model the organisation can sustain.

Design migration and day-two operation together

We begin with workload behaviour, dependencies, licensing, risk, current tooling, and the skills available to run the environment. Technology selection follows from those factors.

  • 1

    Workload & Platform Baseline

    We examine applications, virtual machines, dependencies, performance, storage, networking, identity, compliance, licensing, release practices, and current operating constraints.

  • 2

    Architecture & Migration Sequence

    We define the target platform, workload placement, isolation, availability, lifecycle processes, and staged migration. Decisions account for vendor constraints, ownership, cost, and expected demand.

  • 3

    Build, Test & Migrate

    We prepare and test the platform, automate repeatable deployment and rollback, then move workloads in controlled stages with service validation at each point.

  • 4

    Handover & Day-Two Ownership

    We provide architecture records, runbooks, and knowledge transfer for the operating team, with responsibilities for monitoring, maintenance, incidents, and future platform changes made clear.

Containerised service operation with coordinated failover

Case study: High-Availability SIP Infrastructure for a Live Voice Service

Containers used as part of an active/standby SIP service stack.

View Case Study

For a UK communications provider, we built a high-availability SIP service using separate components for routing, call handling, media anchoring and real-time event translation. The services ran in containers across active/standby pairs, with explicit startup ordering and stable virtual endpoints.

The database started before the SIP service and the virtual endpoints were enabled afterwards. Custom checks assessed the complete service stack, so a confirmed fault could move service to the standby as a coordinated unit rather than recover unrelated containers independently.

Application requirements remain visible

Platform decisions are tested against application state, data, network flows, integrations, release behaviour, and support needs. Containerisation is recommended only where those constraints can be handled properly.

Day-two work is part of the design

Patching, upgrades, monitoring, capacity, backup, recovery, access, and incident ownership are defined with the architecture so the platform remains manageable after migration.

Ownership comes before optional support

The platform is designed for the organisation's operating model, with documentation and tooling that support internal ownership. Ongoing Onyxsis support is available where useful, but it is not a substitute for a workable day-two design.

Defined cover is available through SLA-Based Technical Support, with agreed response, coverage, and escalation for applications and platforms. Engineering Support Hours are available for bounded maintenance, investigation, and improvement work.

Where the platform change also requires application or integration work, see systems and API integration and bespoke operational systems and tooling.

Discuss the Platform

Frequently Asked Questions

Have a question about a workload or platform requirement? Tell us what you need.

Plan the platform around its workloads and operating constraints

We can review the current environment, determine what should remain, migrate, or be containerised, and define an architecture with deployment, rollback, lifecycle work, and ownership made explicit.