Virtualisation & Container Platforms
Design the platform around its workloads and the people who will operate it.
We design, migrate and improve virtualisation and container platforms around the applications they need to run. The approach accounts for dependencies, performance, licensing, security, deployment practices and day-two ownership.
Discuss Your Platform
Make day-two operation part of the architecture
Virtualisation and containers can consolidate workloads and make releases more repeatable, but only when storage, networking, identity, observability, backup, capacity and lifecycle work are considered together. Otherwise they move complexity rather than reducing it.
We begin with the applications and operating environment. Some workloads may suit containers, others may remain as virtual machines, and some may need changes before either route is appropriate. The architecture, migration sequence, deployment tooling, and ongoing operating model follow from those findings.
This can include:
- Workload, dependency, and suitability assessment to decide what should remain, migrate, or be containerised
- Virtualisation and cluster architecture aligned to compute, storage, network, availability, and licensing requirements
- Container runtime and orchestration standards selected according to workload behaviour and operational capability
- Isolation, identity, and network controls designed around tenant, application, and administrative boundaries
- Deployment, validation, and rollback automation to make releases and infrastructure changes repeatable
- Monitoring, patching, backup, and lifecycle processes so the platform remains supportable after migration
- Staged migration with documented ownership to limit disruption and leave the operating team in control
If application constraints make platform change difficult, existing and legacy system engineering can address the application-level work alongside the infrastructure programme.
Technology selected for workload and operating fit
-
Virtualisation
KVM, QEMU, XCP-ng, Xen, oVirt
-
Application & System Containers
Docker, Podman, LXC, LXD
-
Container Runtimes
containerd
-
Orchestration & Cluster Management
Nomad, Kubernetes, OpenShift, Rancher, Docker Swarm
-
Existing & Migration Platforms
VMware, Hyper-V, Proxmox VE
Where virtualisation and containers can improve control and supportability
Changes are assessed against the complete workload environment, not treated as an isolated technology refresh.
What the platform needs to make more predictable
The objective is not containerisation or consolidation for its own sake. It is safer change, appropriate isolation, clearer capacity, repeatable deployment, and an operating model the organisation can sustain.
-
Explicit Workload Isolation
Tenant, application, network, and administrative boundaries are matched to the actual security requirement. -
Measured Resource Allocation
CPU, memory, storage and network resources are adjusted against workload demand while preserving the operating margin agreed for the platform. -
Consistent Platform Management
Monitoring, patching, lifecycle work, and troubleshooting follow understood processes across hosts and clusters. -
Repeatable Deployment & Recovery
Standardised pipelines, validation, and rollback reduce manual variation during releases and updates. -
Capacity That Can Change Deliberately
Hosts, nodes, replicas, and workloads can be adjusted through tested processes as demand changes. -
Integration With Existing Operations
The platform works with established identity, monitoring, backup, release, and support workflows rather than creating a separate operational island.
Design migration and day-two operation together
We begin with workload behaviour, dependencies, licensing, risk, current tooling, and the skills available to run the environment. Technology selection follows from those factors.
-
Workload & Platform Baseline
We examine applications, virtual machines, dependencies, performance, storage, networking, identity, compliance, licensing, release practices, and current operating constraints.
-
Architecture & Migration Sequence
We define the target platform, workload placement, isolation, availability, lifecycle processes, and staged migration. Decisions account for vendor constraints, ownership, cost, and expected demand.
-
Build, Test & Migrate
We prepare and test the platform, automate repeatable deployment and rollback, then move workloads in controlled stages with service validation at each point.
-
Handover & Day-Two Ownership
We provide architecture records, runbooks, and knowledge transfer for the operating team, with responsibilities for monitoring, maintenance, incidents, and future platform changes made clear.
Containerised service operation with coordinated failover
Case study: High-Availability SIP Infrastructure for a Live Voice Service
Containers used as part of an active/standby SIP service stack.
For a UK communications provider, we built a high-availability SIP service using separate components for routing, call handling, media anchoring and real-time event translation. The services ran in containers across active/standby pairs, with explicit startup ordering and stable virtual endpoints.
The database started before the SIP service and the virtual endpoints were enabled afterwards. Custom checks assessed the complete service stack, so a confirmed fault could move service to the standby as a coordinated unit rather than recover unrelated containers independently.
Application requirements remain visible
Platform decisions are tested against application state, data, network flows, integrations, release behaviour, and support needs. Containerisation is recommended only where those constraints can be handled properly.
Day-two work is part of the design
Patching, upgrades, monitoring, capacity, backup, recovery, access, and incident ownership are defined with the architecture so the platform remains manageable after migration.
Ownership comes before optional support
The platform is designed for the organisation's operating model, with documentation and tooling that support internal ownership. Ongoing Onyxsis support is available where useful, but it is not a substitute for a workable day-two design.
Defined cover is available through SLA-Based Technical Support, with agreed response, coverage, and escalation for applications and platforms. Engineering Support Hours are available for bounded maintenance, investigation, and improvement work.
Where the platform change also requires application or integration work, see systems and API integration and bespoke operational systems and tooling.
Frequently Asked Questions
Have a question about a workload or platform requirement? Tell us what you need.
Plan the platform around its workloads and operating constraints
We can review the current environment, determine what should remain, migrate, or be containerised, and define an architecture with deployment, rollback, lifecycle work, and ownership made explicit.