SLA-Based Technical Support
Agreed technical response for services with clear ownership.
We agree the applications, integrations, platforms, infrastructure dependencies, risks, support boundaries, and change controls before setting an SLA that reflects how the service is actually operated.
Discuss Your Support Requirement
Contracted cover around an explicit technical scope
Organisations currently use this SLA model where their applications and supporting environments require defined incident response, escalation, maintenance and technical follow-through. Coverage can include agreed integrations, platforms and infrastructure where they form part of the supported service.
This is not a generic managed IT or end-user helpdesk service. We onboard the relevant architecture, dependencies, operating hours, service impact, access, monitoring, runbooks, suppliers, and change controls. The contract then states what Onyxsis owns, what remains with the organisation, and how incidents and planned work will be handled.
An agreed SLA can include:
- Tiered response targets and coverage windows with documented channels, severity handling, and escalation routes
- Incident triage, containment, and service recovery across the application and its agreed technical dependencies
- Defect correction and root-cause investigation to address recurring failures rather than repeatedly restoring service without correcting the cause
- Security and dependency maintenance scheduled around release, approval, and operational controls
- Planned stabilisation and supportability work within the responsibilities and limits set during onboarding
- Service reporting and improvement actions so SLA performance, recurring issues, and decisions remain visible
If a system needs contracted cover, we can review its service criticality, technical boundaries, current ownership, and required coverage before confirming the appropriate tier. Discuss the support requirement.
At a Glance
Current advertised commercial terms and coverage options.
-
Pricing
Priced per supported application according to the agreed tier, technical boundary, and coverage responsibilities
-
Minimum Contract Term
12 months
-
Support Tiers
Tier 1 (24/7), Tier 2 (Mon-Fri), Tier 3 (Mon-Fri email only)
-
Response Time
From 1 hour (tier-dependent)
-
Scope
Incident triage, live outage response and service recovery, bug fixes, security & dependency patching, planned maintenance, and escalation management
Where an agreed SLA removes ambiguity
Each use case starts with an agreed system boundary, service impact, and division of responsibility. Support then follows those facts rather than a generic catalogue.
Choose coverage according to application criticality
Not every application carries the same operational risk. The three tiers align response targets, coverage windows, and communication channels to the role each supported application plays, while keeping responsibilities explicit.
Each tier includes onboarding to confirm scope, dependencies, incident channels, escalation, and maintenance arrangements. Reporting provides evidence of performance and recurring technical work over the contract term.
| Tier 1 | Tier 2 | Tier 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Response Time | Up to 1 hour | Up to 12 hours | Up to 1 working day |
| Coverage | 24/7/365 | Mon to Fri 1 | Mon to Fri 1 |
| Support Channels | Agreed channels | Agreed channels | Email only |
| Uptime Guarantee 2 | Contract-defined | Not included | Not included |
1 UK business hours.
2 Uptime guarantees and service credits are defined contractually during onboarding.
Pricing is confirmed after reviewing the application boundary, required tier, and operational responsibilities
Minimum 12-month engagement
Responsibilities available within the agreed scope
Each tier includes structured incident handling, technical follow-through, agreed maintenance responsibilities, and reporting. Exact coverage is confirmed during onboarding so application, integration, platform, infrastructure, supplier, and organisational boundaries are explicit.
-
Incident Triage & Recovery
Intake, severity assessment, containment, restoration, and escalation aligned to the agreed service model. -
Defect Correction & Root-Cause Investigation
Debugging to restore function, followed by documented findings and remediation matched to the cause and recurrence risk. -
Security & Dependency Maintenance
Relevant vulnerability and dependency work scheduled against the supported system's release and change controls. -
Context Across Technical Boundaries
Support accounts for agreed applications, integrations, data flows, platforms, and infrastructure rather than treating each symptom in isolation. -
SLA & Service Reporting
Response performance, incident patterns, material changes, and follow-up actions are recorded against the contracted obligations. -
Planned Maintenance & Stabilisation
Agreed maintenance and corrective work keep the supported environment operable and address known risks.
Support Informed by the Agreed Environment
Active cover with explicit boundaries
Organisations currently use this SLA model for systems requiring a dependable technical response. Onboarding defines coverage and exclusions before support begins, including responsibilities shared with internal teams and third parties.
Delivery context carries into the SLA
The SLA protects agreed applications and environments using technical context carried forward from delivery. It provides focused, ongoing support for the systems within scope and can sit alongside an organisation’s wider support arrangements.
Restore service, then follow the evidence
Incident recovery is followed by a written account of the impact, findings, actions taken and recommended next steps. Planned changes are agreed through the organisation's controls rather than introduced simply because a ticket was raised.
For bounded investigation or improvement work outside the contracted SLA scope, Engineering Support Hours provide a separate block-hours model. Wider diagnostic work can be handled through technical investigation and operational diagnostics.
Frequently Asked Questions
Need to compare tiers or define the supported boundary? Tell us which systems need support.
Define the support boundary for important systems
We can review application criticality, dependencies, operating hours, ownership, and coverage needs, then confirm whether the SLA model and one of the current tiers are appropriate.